A report on the misuse of funds by the nation's four State-owned asset
management companies (AMCs) released by auditors on Tuesday has cast doubt on
their ability to operate as commercial bad debt clearers, as was planned.
Analysts said yesterday the AMCs would have to work hard to improve their
corporate governance mechanisms and internal control systems to be able to face
challenges lying ahead.
Last year State auditors found irregularities and cases of misuse of funds
involving a combined 71.5 billion yuan (US$8.6 billion), which accounted for 13
per cent of all funds audited.
The AMCs were quick to respond to criticism, pledging to penalize those
responsible and take measures to close system loopholes.
China Cinda Asset Management Corporation said on Wednesday it would set up a
financial risk research centre to study measures to reduce moral hazards in the
process of bad loan resolution.
China Orient Asset Management Corporation has started a 10-day education
campaign among staffers on compliance.
But more hard work lies ahead, analysts say. "The absence of a sound
corporate governance structure started from the very moment the asset management
companies were created," Yan Qingming, director of the Banking Supervision
Department under the China Banking Regulatory Commission, told a seminar on
Wednesday.
"Regulators need to strengthen scrutiny over their corporate governance," he
said, adding his commission and the finance ministry are working on measures to
enhance supervision of the AMCs, including stricter information disclosure
requirements.
Wang Songqi, a senior economist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, is
less than optimistic.
"It's quite expensive and inefficient to operate asset management companies
like them," he said.
"Why do we need them in the first place if what they are doing can simply be
done by some other intermediaries or by the banks themselves?"
The four AMCs were established in 1999 to take over a combined 1.4 trillion
yuan (US$168 billion) of bad loans from the big four State-owned commercial
banks in a major drive to clean up the bad loan-ridden banking sector.
The AMCs had disposed of 688.6 billion yuan (US$83 billion) of non-performing
loans by the end of March, recovering cash equivalent to a little more than 20
per cent of their face value, which some analysts say underperformed other
emerging markets.
Amid accusations of inefficiency, analysts are uncertain about the competence
of the AMCs to successfully become debt clearers.
The AMCs are allowed to work as commercial debt clearers if they finish their
policy-based bad loan disposal work, with which they were tasked upon their
establishment, by the end of next year.
While they may find it difficult to win commercial deals once their
privileges are revoked when market reforms deepen, the companies will also face
fierce competition in investment banking, which they plan as another business
arena, analysts say.
The Ministry of Finance, currently the sole owner of the four AMCs, is
soliciting opinions from the firms about a draft reform plan, which requires
them to undergo joint stock restructuring and usher in strategic investors from
both home and abroad, sources said previously.