As the 10-day ultimatum given by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has
ended, differences among Palestinian factions remained mounting.
On Monday night, Abbas' aides spoke about the failure of the
inter-Palestinian talks, known as the national dialogue. But the ruling Islamic
Resistance Movement (Hamas) and its sister group the Islamic jihad rejected the
remarks of failure and said "it didn't begin yet."
"The circulations about the national dialogue's failure aim at easing
carrying out the referendum," Khaled al-Batsh, senior Islamic Jihad member in
Gaza told reporters on Tuesday.
"The referendum draws the people to say their word over the conflict with the
enemy in a way that gives the enemy a right in Palestine," he added.
President Abbas opened on May 25 a national dialogue by asking Palestinian
factions to accept and adopt within ten days the National Accordance filed by
Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails, or he would put the proposal to a
referendum within 40 days.
The prisoners' document calls for the establishment of an independent
Palestinian state on the territories that were occupied by Israel in the 1967
Arab-Israeli war.
The Document of National Accordance, also known as Prisoners' Document,
contradicts with both Hamas and Islamic Jihad's charters that call for the
destruction of Israel.
Hamas, which leads the government, and the Islamic Jihad, which doesn't run
on the political stage, have boycotted the following sessions of the dialogue
after Abbas' ultimatum.
"Neither we or Hamas took part in the dialogue, so how can it ends," al-Batsh
wondered. "The dialogue is being held in Ramallah between members of the
Palestinian Liberation Organization who magreed on that program (the document)
before the dialogue began."
Al-Batsh considered the dialogue as "internal" which involves the factions
that are represented within the PLO.
Hamas and the Islamic Jihad are the only big parties that stayed away from
joining the PLO which is dominated by Abbas-led Fatah movement.
Meanwhile, al-Batsh denounced Abbas for his intention to hold a referendum on
the Prisoners' Document and accused him of trying to get "a new record for
negotiations".
"It seems there are bids to confuse the public and make themloose confidence
with the resistance factions to rapidly reach thereferendum," said al-Batsh.
"By the referendum, Abbas will get a new record for negotiations to be
submitted for East and West," he said, adding "I say he doesn't need more
records, they have lots of papers, and it seems he wants to embarrass the
factions."
Meanwhile, Bassam al-Salhi, the Secretary-General of the People's Party said
that the referendum was Abbas' own decision, and that it was not subject during
the national dialogue sessions.
"At the end of the matter, the referendum is a step that the president
decides, he might discuss it with the PLO executive committee, but everyone has
to know that the referendum was Abbas' own decision," al-Salhi told the Voice of
Palestine radio.
However, al-Salhi defended the referendum as the only democratic option left.
"Instead of appealing to guns and bullets, the people must appeal by free
democratic voting, this will not be easy, but it is the only democratic choice
so far."
But the Islamic Jihad will not participate in the referendum. Moreover, it
will ask its supporters to boycott at least or vote against the Document of
National Accordance, as senior Jihad member Khaled al-Batsh said.
Hamas is also expected to order its people not to vote in favor of the
Document.
While questioning the referendum, the Popular Front for the Liberation of
Palestine (PFLP) has called for giving more time to the factions.
"The talks entered a difficult way and I think we might have reached the end,
but I say we have to be given more time," KhaledaJarar, a lawmaker represents
the PFLP also told the Voice of Palestine radio.
"We must deepen efforts to come out with national agreements acting as joint
basis between various factions and programs," she added.