Syria forced into predicament after Hariri's killing
28/12/2005 15:01
Related Story: Syria Pullout from Lebanon
Syria, once a power-broker
in neighboring Lebanon, was forced into predicament after the killing of former
Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. Many Lebanese believe that Syrian
military and intelligence forces, which have penetrated into the Lebanese
society, were behind the Feb. 14 car bombing that took lives of Hariri and 20
others. Following the tragedy, anti-Syrian emotions ran high as hundreds of
thousands of Lebanese took to the street to protest against presence of Syrian
forces in Lebanon. Meanwhile, the United States, which has long blacklisted
Damascus as a state sponsoring terrorism, along with other western powers,
exerted mounting pressure on Syria and pressed for a full pullout. Some
analysts said the Hariri murder was seen by the United States as a "good chance"
to force a policy change from Damascus, which is regarded by Washington as a
hindrance to its Mideast strategy. Syria, which has been under US economic
sanctions since May 2004, had to withdraw its troops from Lebanon in late April,
ending its 29-year-old military presence. The UN Security Council then
adopted Resolution 1595 to set up an international investigation committee into
the killing and Detlev Mehlis, a German prosecutor, was in May appointed as head
of the committee. On Oct. 20, Mehlis submitted an interim report to the
United Nations, accusing Syria of being involved in Hariri's killing, a charge
rejected by Damascus as politically motivated. Syria set up its own judicial
commission in late October in a bid to avoid international sanctions as
threatened in a draft UN resolution sponsored by the United States, France and
Britain. The three, however, dropped the wording of economic sanctions at the
last moment to secure a unanimous vote. Resolution 1636 was then adopted by the
Security Council on Oct. 31, demanding that Syria fully cooperate with the probe
or face unspecified "further action." In early November, Mehlis requested to
question six Syrian officials, including President Bashar al-Assad's
brother-in-law and powerful military intelligence chief Assef Shawkat, in his
headquarters in eastern Beirut. Damascus rejected the idea and proposed
instead to hold the inquiries either in UN offices in Syria or the Arab League
headquarters in Cairo, while Assad expressed distrust of Mehlis' probe and hit
back at external pressure. Mehlis rejected Damascus' proposal to first sign a
cooperation protocol before agreeing on the venue of
questioning. Unexpectedly, Syria agreed on Nov. 25 to let the committee
question five officials at UN offices in Vienna to avoid a showdown with the
United Nations after mediation from Russia and Saudi Arabia. Syria said it
accepted the "compromise" proposal after it received reassurances that its
sovereignty will be respected and rights of the individuals guaranteed. On
Dec. 13, Syria dismissed Mehlis' second UN report that Damascus' cooperation
with the probe into Hariri's killing was slow-paced. "We think that remarks
in the UN report that said Syria was slow-paced in fully cooperating with the
probe of the international investigation committee are inaccurate," the Syrian
Foreign Ministry said in a statement. Mehlis submitted his second report to
the Security Council one day earlier, which found "new evidence" that further
implicated Syria in Hariri's death. The report also accused Syria of hampering
the investigation with "reluctance and delay." Local analysts say that Syria
would tread the line of cooperation and resistance to go out of the
tunnel.
Xinhua news
|