Californian voters flock to polling stations in expected higher turnout
3/11/2004 10:18
US voters formed long lines outside polling stations across California
Tuesday morning to cast their ballots in the 2004 presidential elections as
state officials predicted an unprecedented turnout. About 40 voters lined in
beautiful morning sunshine outside the polling station at the cross streets of
Holly Ave. and Campus Rd. in Arcadia, eastern Los Angeles County, as of 6:30
a.m. local time (1430 GMT), half hour ahead of the opening of the station. "I
came in Los Angeles earlier in order to avoid the lines, because I have to go to
work today," a Philippine-American woman who only identified her first name as
Jennifer told Xinhua. California's polling stations opened at 7 a.m. local
time (1500 GMT) and will close at 8 p.m. (0400 GMT). Election officials,
predicting unprecedented turnout, had repeatedly urged voters to avoid the
early-hour lines by going to the polling stations at mid- day. California
Secretary of State's office said Monday that it was expecting 73 percent of
registered voters to cast their ballots Tuesday for president, plus, a
near-record number of propositions and other key California races. This will
beat the 70 percent turnout record set in the 2000 elections. Voters have
more than two candidates for president to choose from the California ballot this
year. Jennifer said she voted neither for President Bush nor for Democrat
challenger John Kerry, but for the unknown independent candidate Michael
Peroutka, state chair of the conservative Constitution Party in
Maryland. "For me, there are four major non-negotiable issues that affected
my vote decision: I'm against abortion, stem sell research, homosexual marriage
and human cloning," she said. California, the most populous US state with the
highest number of electoral votes at 55, has been largely sidelined by the
leading candidates in this year's presidential campaigns. Kerry has been
maintaining a comfortable lead over Bush in this traditional Democrats
stronghold. The independent Field Poll issued on the eve of election day
showed Kerry was leading 49 percent to Bush's 42 percent. Bush tried in vain to
win California in 2000 after spending millions of dollars in campaign ads and
visiting the state many times. This year, he almost abandoned the sunshine state
in order to pour his money and energy to his campaigns in the battleground
states in the East. Chuck Fontes, a Latino-American maintenance supervisor
and a self-declared Democrat, said he voted for Kerry this time although he
voted for Bush in the last elections. "Four years ago, I voted for Bush because
I thought he was a better man, but four years later I voted against Bush,
because he is worse," he told Xinhua. Fontes, a veteran, said he made the
decision to vote for Kerry after he heard about Bush's statements indicating
that he will reinstitute the draft. "I'm just against the draft, absolutely," he
said, adding Kerry could be a better commander-in-chief for dealing with the
mess in Iraq. But Rusty Lebuda, a legal secretary, disagreed with Fontes'
views and voted for Bush, although her daughter voted for Kerry. A migrant
from Boston where her family lived in the same area with the famous Democrat
Keneddy Family, Lebuda argued that the American people should support President
Bush "to let him finish his mission in Iraq." "We are in the war. It's wrong
to change the commander-in-chief in the middle of war," she told Xinhua,
stressing that she felt obliged to vote this year to support Bush despite that
she had not voted for many years. Lebuda said she is not disturbed by the
fact that neither candidates paid much attention to California. "When I decided
to vote, only their opinions matter," she said. Jane Wang, a Chinese-American
from Taiwan, was one of the undecided voters that both Bush and Kerry had been
wooing until the last minute of their campaigns. She gave her vote to Kerry
at the last minute. "I just think that I like Kerry better, because President
Bush is hawkish and he just likes going to war," Wang said. Although Arcadia
is a high-class suburban community where Chinese-Americans account for nearly 40
percent of the city population, not many Chinese-American voters went to vote as
usual. The reason? Wang blamed the reluctance to vote by Chinese Americans on
the language and cultural barriers. She said it took her more than one day to go
through all the issues on the ballot. Indeed, there are 16 propositions on
the California ballot in addition to the choices for the president and some
seats in the state Legislature. "It is not easy for someone who is not good
at English, and of course, the cultural difference also plays a role," she told
Xinhua, adding that she was glad that she could vote using the Chinese version
of ballot. Due to the extremely tight race this year, most of Californian
voters are worried about the fair results of the elections. The independent
Field poll showed Monday that two-thirds of Californians believed it was likely
that problems at the polls nationwide will call into question the results of the
presidential election. Thirty percent of registered voters in California said
it was very likely polling problems could cast doubt on the winner, while 37
percent said it was somewhat likely. Only 29 percent believe it was not
likely.
Xinhua
|