Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's passing away last week lowered the
curtain for his half-century efforts of Palestinian liberation, but the Middle
East peace process continued and arrived at a new crossroad.
CHALLENGES TO NEW PALESTINIAN LEADERSHIP
Despite an initial smooth transfer of power last Thursday, the new
Palestinian leadership is facing a difficult job of adapting to a collective
leadership and winning popular trust in their endeavors towards peace with
Israel in the absence of Arafat.
The power transfer did not necessarily give the new leaders therespect and
support Arafat had enjoyed among the Palestinians and in the international
community. To them, how to unite all the Palestinians and how to win the
Palestinians' trust are two major tasks.
Adapting to changes from a single decision-maker to collective leadership
will be crucial for Palestine's political stability, analysts here said.
Rawhi Fattuh, speaker of the Palestine Legislative Council, wassworn in as
interim president for 60 days as stipulated by Palestinian laws and
organizational rules. Farouk Kadoumy, politburo chief of the Palestine
Liberation Organization (PLO), was named head of the mainstream Fatah movement.
Former prime minister Mahmoud Abbas was elected chairman of the PLO. Prime
Minister Ahmed Qurei took over command of the Palestinian securityforce.
It's been left unanswered whether the collective leadership canproceed well
during the 60 days, what the final power sharing willbe after the 60 days and
how the various political parties will participate in the new political
structure.
The new leadership, though more moderate, realistic and flexible than Arafat
as many analysts anticipated, can not sacrifice the national interests of the
Palestinians in exchange for peace with Israel.
Thus how to balance the interests of different armed factions and forces and
to avoid internal political bickering will be a great test for the new leaders.
ISRAEL'S UNILATERAL PLAN HITS DEAD END
Israel has long regarded Arafat as the "greatest obstruction topeace" and
refused to negotiate with him, but now Arafat has gone and Israel lost the
excuse for its refusal of negotiation.
Arafat's death pushed Sharon to re-exam his unilateral plan andits
consequences. The four-year-long mass conflicts between Israeland Palestinians
have brought huge losses to both sides, which called for peaceful way out.
However, such pricky issues as territories, refugees and the final status of
Jerusalem take time to resolve. Therefore, even though peace talks began, that
was just the first step towards thepossible realization of the Mideast peace
process.
BUSH'S POLICE ON ISRAEL KEY TO MIDEAST SITUATION
US President George W. Bush was re-elected earlier this month, and after
Arafat's death Bush promised to establish a Palestinian state within four years.
"I believe we've got a great chance to establish a Palestinian state and I'm
prepared over the next four years to spend the capital of the United States to
establish such a state," Bush saidafter Arafat's death.
He said he will work with Israeli and Palestinian leaders to complete
Israel's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and part of the West Bank.
Bush's willingness to restart peace talks based on the interests and strategy
of the United States, for the continuing conflicts in the Middle East has
brought Washington no benefits.
But Bush has given no sign of applying additional pressure on Israel so far,
and how to deal with Sharon's unilateral plan remains a big challenge to the US
president.