Advanced Search
Business | Metro | Nation | World | Sports | Features | Specials | Delta Stories
 
 
Iraqi party chief sees compromised vote as seed for future dispute
17/1/2005 15:50

Lack of security makes it impossible to stage a free and fair general election in Iraq as scheduled for Jan. 30, and a compromised vote would sow seeds for future disputes among Iraqis and drag out the occupation forces' stay in the country, an Iraqi Sunni political leader said Sunday.
A rushed election would only add pains to the Iraqi people, said Mohsen Abdul Hamid, head of the Iraqi Islamic Party, one of the country's major Sunni parties.
When Iraqis are living in fear of their lives everyday, postponing the polls until the situation improves would be in the best interest of them, Hamid told Xinhua in an exclusive interview.
Iraqis will elect on Jan. 30 a 275-member interim national assembly that would in turn form a transitional government and draft a permanent constitution before another round of elections at the end of the year.
While the US occupation and the Iraqi interim government are geared up for the vote, the Islamic Party cried foul after learning that a large number of voters have been denied access even to registration forms.
The party withdrew its 275-member candidate list from the race in protest against lack of security and transparency in electoral arrangements. It advocates a six-month delay of the vote, saying the situation would improve by then.
"The security conditions are going from bad to worse in provinces. Obviously, it would be impossible to hold the elections in about five to six provinces, which hold more than one third of the Iraqi population," Hamid said.
The Iraqi government admitted Saturday that four out of 18 Iraqi provinces would be insecure for broad participation in the landmark elections, and the government is in talks with political parties and local leaders to get the greatest participation possible.
WINNER OF PEOPLE'S HEARTS
Hardly a day goes by in Iraq without a roadside or car bomb attack against Iraqi and US forces.
Religious figures, government officials and police chiefs across the country continued to be gunned down by insurgents. Hard- core anti-US military groups have threatened to shoot voters or blow up polling stations if Iraqis dare venture out on the voting day.
Several Sunni groups have argued that it's premature to hold elections when people are not even guaranteed a safe return to their homes after casting ballots. A good number of them are expected to lie low.
Hamid said pulling out of the election does not mean the party has lost the race. "We are the winners as we have stayed closer to our society and able to express our hopes and pains. After all, we won the hearts and minds of people," he said.
Hamid was one of the four Sunnis in the 25-member Iraqi Governing Council, which was appointed by the US occupation in July 2003 and dissolved a year later after the installation of the interim government.
However, Hamid said his party "is not boycotting the elections, as can be proved by the list we have fielded for the electoral commission." The Islamic Party presented a list including 275 candidates for the running.
A major player in the Iraqi political arena, the Islamic Party participated in the interim government. But it pulled out in November in protest against the US-led assault on the insurgent stronghold of Fallujah authorized by Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi.
DELAY PREFERRED
Hamid said that he would reconsider participation only if the government postpones the elections for another six months. Such a delay will help promote the unity of Iraqi people, he said.
"God's willing, the security situation would change if the elections are postponed for six months when people can understand more about the elections, and discover who are behind the scene trying to destabilize the country."
Iraqi Sunnis fear that in places like Baghdad, Mosul and Ramadi where insurgents still hold sway, the election can not take place as planned. They also fear that lopsided voting would undermine the credibility of the poll.
"Elections that are not all-inclusive could bring great tragedies to the Iraqi people and spark disputes. These would prolong the occupation in Baghdad, which goes against the will of the Iraqi people," he said.
But he seems realistic about US presence in Iraq, saying the election date has nothing to do with the withdrawal timetable of the foreign troops.
However, he insists there be a timetable for the withdrawal, " whether it takes several months, a year, or even longer."
Spurning the "ill-prepared" elections, Hamid said he would not recognize the legitimacy of the national assembly to be elected or any decisions by it, since they can not fully represent Iraqis' will.
"We will reject anything that contradicts the interests of Iraqi people and goes against the political process that we advocate," he said.
CHAMPIONING UNITY AMONG IRAQIS
The Islamic Party's position echoed that of the Muslim Scholars Association, an influential religious body in Iraq's Sunni community.
But Hamid said his party is making independent decisions as they have their own consultative council. "We only need the cooperation and solidarity of others," he said, adding that his party "has a brotherly and consultative relation with the Association."
Although the two groups' objection to the Jan. 30 election have not created a domino effect so far in Iraq, a Sunni tribal coalition did join the chorus.
The Patriotic Front for Iraqi Tribes announced Wednesday it would withdraw from the elections unless it is postponed until security improves.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan told journalists Friday that conditions for elections in Iraq were not ideal, and that Iraqi officials should intensify efforts to make them all-inclusive.
As quite a few Iraqi Sunnis are expected to boycott the elections, Shiites, accounting for 60 percent of Iraq's 26 million population, are predicted to win a landslide victory in the elections.
Referring to the hyped-up sectarian strife between Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq, Hamid said his party has good relations and stand united with the Shiite trends in front of those who want to start a sectarian war in Iraq.
Hamid, head of the country's biggest Islamic party, said: "This conspiracy would surely not stand in the way of our cooperation and a sectarian war is out of the question."
"We are always in touch with some of the Shiite parties and individuals to exchange opinions about the future of Iraq. We are calling for the national unity in the highest pitch," he said.




Xinhua News