Hollywood held its breath as the race for the Oscars entered its final stage.
Unlike last year¡¯s utterly predictable ceremony, when clear front-runners took
all the acting awards and The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King left
precious few trophies for anyone else, this year¡¯s Oscar night is loaded with
uncertainty.
The prevailing sense in Hollywood is that Clint Eastwood¡¯s boxing saga
Million Dollar Baby will triumph because it carries an emotional wallop lacking
in Martin Scorsese¡¯s Howard Hughes epic The Aviator.
It is not often the Oscars see two giants of American cinema duke it for both
the best director and best picture awards.
Eastwood has won a best picture and best director¡¯s Oscar before¡ªin 1993 for
Unforgiven¡ªand many say his Mystic River should have won last year¡¯s best
picture award over the third and final The Lord of the Rings drama.
Yet The Aviator is not down for the count. It has grand filmmaking buoyed by
spectacular visuals, excellent performances and an engaging glimpse of old
Hollywood in all its garish glory.
Million Dollar Baby has the momentum, though. While Aviator is made on a
grand scale, including a harrowing air crash, Million Dollar Baby is its near
polar opposite¡ªsmall in scale and as dramatic, touching and troublesome a story
as moviegoers could find.
Baby has two secret weapons, the experts said. One is the popularity of the
74-year-old Eastwood among his fellow actors, who make up the largest block of
Oscars voters¡ª1,277 out of 5,808¡ªwhile the other is the film¡¯s late general
release, which has left it fresh in the minds of voters.
As with best picture, the directing category is a two-contestant race.
Eastwood won the Golden Globe and the Directors Guild of America honor, the
latter being a solid forecast of who will go on to win the Oscar.
Only six times in the previous 56 years has the guild winner failed to take
the directing Oscar, though three of those times have come in the last nine
years, and the guild is only two-for-four in predicting the academy winner over
the last four years.
Career sentiment could creep into some voters¡¯thinking. Eastwood, also
nominated a year ago for Mystic River, won the directing Oscar for Unforgiven,
while Scorsese has one of the most notable records of futility at the Oscars for
a filmmaker of his stature.
Nominated four times previously (Raging Bull, The Last Temptation of Christ,
GoodFellas and Gangs of New York), Scorsese has lost every time. He was
considered a sentimental favorite two years ago for Gangs, but that movie was
shut out in all 10 of its Oscar categories.
But this year the 62-year-old Scorsese was supposed to have his best shot in
decades because he created a film of the sort that traditionally wins Oscars.
The Aviator is an epic like such previous winners as Gladiator and Titanic.
It¡¯s about Hollywood¡¯s glamour days of the 1930s and 1940s.
Jamie Foxx is seen as the clear front-runner for his stunning performance as
the blind singer and pianist Ray Charles. If Foxx were not on the scene, any one
of these actors could walk away with the Oscar.
But Oscar newcomer Foxx, a double nominee as a supporting-actor pick for
Collateral, is so good that even Ray Charles¡¯son and longtime pal Quincy
Joneshave said they felt like it was the singer himself on screen instead.
Foxx has dominated lead-actor honors at earlier Hollywood ceremonies, his
prizes including a Golden Globe and Screen Actors Guild award.
Hilary Swank is favorite to win best actress.
But she has a tough battle on her hands against Annette Bening, nominated for
her role in Being Julia, who lost out on the same award five years ago when
Swank won for Boys Don¡¯t Cry.
This time, Swank is the front-runner again, having won the Screen Actors
Guild honor and the Golden Globe for dramatic actress with a performance that
cuts even deeper than her breakout role in Boys Don¡¯t Cry.
Bening, also a previous Oscar nominee as supporting actress for The Grifters,
took the Globe for best actress in a musical or comedy for Being Julia, playing
an aging stage diva coping with duplicitous men and a young rival.