By Jefferson Morley
washingtonpost.com Staff Writer
Tuesday, March 1,
2005; 9:54 AM
"The noose is tightening around Syria."
So wrote columnist Musa Keilani in the Jordan Times on Sunday. A day later,
Lebanon's pro-Syrian government resigned -- and the noose got a little tighter.
Syria is fast losing ground in a geopolitical power struggle that its leaders
did not see coming and may not survive, according to international online
pundits. Since the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq Hariri
two weeks ago, the government of President Bashar Assad has seen its political
reality transformed.
A month ago, Lebanon, on Syria's western border, was quiet. Hariri and
his political allies muted any criticism of Damascus despite 15,000 troops
stationed in Lebanon since 1989. To the south, Syria was offering to reopen
negotiations with Israel with faint hopes of regaining the Golan Heights, Syrian
territory occupied by Israel since a war in 1967. On Syria's eastern border,
U.S. officials complained that Syria was harboring Iraqi insurgents, but Syria's
security services cultivated favor with Washington by doing the dirty work of
interrogating terrorism suspects.
Then came the Feb. 14 car bomb that killed Hariri and 13 other people.
Hariri's allies blamed the assassination on Syria, and the long-tolerated Syrian
military presence suddenly became intolerable to many Lebanese. The killing of
Hariri, says Hazem Saghieh, columnist for the Beirut-based daily Dar al-Hayat
was "Lebanon's 9-11," the violent attack that changed the way people think about
their world.
"People's sentiments in Lebanon are turning into a political reality that is
stronger than what the authority realizes and subsequently it is bigger than the
authority's ability to contain it," wrote fellow commentator Walid Choucair.
The signs are all around.
In Brussels last week, President George Bush and French President Jacques
Chirac who don't agree on much, agreed that Syria should withdraw its troops
from Lebanon. That would deprive Syria of economic opportunities and its most
valuable bargaining chip in negotiations with Israel.
As the Lebanese government prepared for a confidence vote on Monday,
thousands of opposition supporters rallied around the parliament despite a ban
on public demonstrations. Then Prime Minister Omar Karami and his Syrian-backed
government, which had been expected to survive a no-confidence vote, resigned.
Popular sentiment is swinging further against Syria.
In Qana, a dusty village in southern Lebanon, a statue of Bashar Assad's
father, Hafez Assad, was defaced by vandals, according to the Daily Star.
Even the support of Syria's long-time allies in Hezbollah, the Shiite
political party and militia, is uncertain. Opposition leader Walid Jumblatt
wants to talk with Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah about
joining the effort to get Syria out, according to the Daily Star.
Syrian commentators seem baffled by the government's predicament.
"What are they cooking up?" the editors of the state-controlled Syria Times
ask of the United States and its allies in Lebanon and elsewhere. The demand
that Syria leave Lebanon is "an unfair move that aims to tighten the noose of
blockade around the Arab national movement that resists the expansionist
aggressors" who have never abided by U.N. resolutions on the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict.
But the editors never answer their Syrian Arab News Agency seems even more
clueless. SANA reported yesterday that Assad had "issued the decree No. 75 for
the year 2005," which was said to provide "for the ratification of the
understanding memo signed between Syria and Lebanon in field of national
archive."
That's the entire news item. In a country without a free press, this is what
passes for reporting. By contrast, Lebanon has the freest and most informative
press of any Arab country.
Many Arab commentators charged that Israel
must have been responsible for Hariri's death since it has benefited the most
from the international pressure on Syria. In the West Bank-based Arabic Media
Internet Network, Elias Akleh, a Palestinian-American, wrote "The American
administration, along with its bastard child Israel, has the motives, the means,
and the opportunity to assassinate Hariri. This assassination is directed toward
Lebanon and Syria in the short run, and to Iran and Russia in the long run. It
aims at dividing the region into tiny helpless sectarian states that would be
easy for Israel and for America to control."
But Arab governments have a different message for Damascus, according to the
semi-official Al Ahram Weekly in Egypt.
"Syria is being told to accommodate growing Lebanese and international
requests for a pullout, or at least a substantial redeployment, of troops in
Lebanon," one senior Arab diplomat was quoted as saying. "He added that many
Arab states have made it clear that they 'will not burn their fingers for Syria
any more.'"
"Arab governments know well demands from the international community for a
Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon are not prompted by concern for the aspirations
of the Lebanese people. But, as one senior Egyptian diplomat said, 'the Syrians
are now in a very tight corner.
With friends like these, Syria is finding it harder and harder to resist its
enemies.
"Syria was fragile before," wrote Dar al Hayat commentator Patrick Seale.
"Now it is in danger."